<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title>Pre-market movers  (VMED) (LOOK)</title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/10/pre-market-movers-vmed-look/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/10/pre-market-movers-vmed-look/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/10/pre-market-movers-vmed-look/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/before-the-bell/" rel="tag">Before the bell</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/look/" rel="tag">LookSmart Ltd (LOOK)</a></p><p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/force-protection-inc/frpt/nas">Force Protection</a> (NASDAQ:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/force-protection-inc/frpt/nas">FRPT</a>) gets sales for trucks in UK. Up almost 13% on the news.</p>
<p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/looksmart-ltd/look/nas">LookSmart </a>(NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/looksmart-ltd/look/nas">LOOK</a>) is up 10% on comments on a positive Q1.</p>
<p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/millennium-pharmaceuticals-inc/mlnm/nas">Millennium Pharmaceuticals</a> (NASDAQ:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/millennium-pharmaceuticals-inc/mlnm/nas">MLNM</a>) is up over 50% on a buy-out bid from Takeda Pharmaceutical.</p>
<p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/virgin-media-inc/vmed/nas">Virgin Media</a> (NASDAQ:V<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/virgin-media-inc/vmed/nas">MED</a>) is off over 12% on news it is raising $1 billion.</p>
<p>Stocks may trade differently in the pre-market than they do in the regular session.</p>
<p><em>Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at 247wallst.com. </em></p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;">&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/10/pre-market-movers-vmed-look/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1163586/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.technorati.com/cosmos/search.html?rank=&amp;fc=1&amp;url=http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/10/pre-market-movers-vmed-look/" title="Linking Blogs">Linking&nbsp;Blogs</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/10/pre-market-movers-vmed-look/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>FRPT</category><category>LOOK</category><category>MLNM</category><category>WMED</category><dc:creator>Douglas McIntyre</dc:creator><dc:date>2008-04-10T08:20:00+00:00</dc:date></item><item><title>CNET gets a piece of LookSmart</title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/09/cnet-gets-a-piece-of-looksmart/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/09/cnet-gets-a-piece-of-looksmart/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/09/cnet-gets-a-piece-of-looksmart/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/look/" rel="tag">LookSmart Ltd (LOOK)</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/11/looksmart.gif" alt="" />The performance at<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/looksmart-ltd/look/nas?tabs=quotesandnews"> LookSmart</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/looksmart-ltd/look/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">LOOK</a>) hasn't been too smart over the years. Even though the company is in the red-hot online advertising sector, it still can't seem to get an edge against <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">Google (</a>NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">GOOG</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">Yahoo </a>(NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">YHOO)</a>, and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">Microsoft </a>(NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">MSFT</a>).</p>
<p>For example, in yesterday's <a href="http://investor.shareholder.com/looksmart/releasedetail.cfm?ReleaseID=274678">Q3 report</a>, LookSmart posted a meager 4% increase in revenues to $12.6 million. There was also a GAAP net loss of $4.3 million, or $0.19 per share.</p>
<p>So, to get things on track, LookSmart is rationalizing things. That is, the company <a href="http://www.dealprofiles.com/maprofile.htm?MADealID=91">announced</a> it has sold its FindArticles.com division to <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cnet-networks-inc/cnet/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">CNET</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cnet-networks-inc/cnet/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">CNET)</a> for $20.1 million in cash.</p>
<p>FindArticles.com is a niche asset, with an archive of 11 million articles from more than 3,000 sources. And, for the most part, it looks like a fit for CNET. Expect other content deals from the company.</p>
<p>However, as for LookSmart, it still has a lot of challenges. The company slashed 25% of its workforce and isn't providing any revenue guidance. In other words, things are going to remain cloudy for some time.</p>
<p>Finally, visit <a href="http://www.dealprofiles.com/ma.htm">DealProfiles.com</a> to check out other recent M&amp;A activity.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.dealprofiles.com/ma.htm"></a></p>
<p><em>Tom Taulli is the author of various books, including <a href=" http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0761535616?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=mergerforum0f-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=9325&amp;creativeASIN=0761535616">The Complete M&amp;A Handbook</a><img width="1" height="1" border="0" src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=mergerforum0f-20&amp;l=as2&amp;o=1&amp;a=0761535616" alt="" style="border-style: none ! important; margin: 0px;" /> and <a href=" http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1932159282?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=mergerforum0f-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=9325&amp;creativeASIN=1932159282">The Edgar Online Guide to Decoding Financial Statements</a><img width="1" height="1" border="0" src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=mergerforum0f-20&amp;l=as2&amp;o=1&amp;a=1932159282" alt="" style="border-style: none ! important; margin: 0px;" />.</em></p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;">&nbsp;</p><p><a href=http://investor.shareholder.com/looksmart/releasedetail.cfm?ReleaseID=274678>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/09/cnet-gets-a-piece-of-looksmart/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1035229/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.technorati.com/cosmos/search.html?rank=&amp;fc=1&amp;url=http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/09/cnet-gets-a-piece-of-looksmart/" title="Linking Blogs">Linking&nbsp;Blogs</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/09/cnet-gets-a-piece-of-looksmart/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>Acquisitions</category><category>CNET</category><category>inthenews</category><category>LOOK</category><category>LookSmart</category><dc:creator>Tom Taulli</dc:creator><dc:date>2007-11-09T12:50:00+00:00</dc:date></item><item><title>Are Apple, Wal-Mart and others killing the DVD?</title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/13/are-apple-wal-mart-and-others-killing-the-dvd/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/13/are-apple-wal-mart-and-others-killing-the-dvd/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/13/are-apple-wal-mart-and-others-killing-the-dvd/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/look/" rel="tag">LookSmart Ltd (LOOK)</a></p><img id="vimage_1" alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/10/dvd.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" />The VHS tape had a pretty spectacular run -- over 20 years in the mainstream consumer electronics arena. With the advent of popular and cheap DVD players in the late 1990s, VHS started losing its appeal for most consumers. With $150 DVD recorders now in the mainstream, there is very little reason to own a VCR these days. But with the advent of digital files that just fly from Internet servers to iPods and other devices, are DVDs destined to live a shorter life than the VHS tape?<br /><br />Although recent standards like HD-DVD and Blu-Ray will only find a niche audience most likely (DVDs look so good to the rest of us, you know), it's hard to imagine that a physical medium like the DVD will go away. DVD players are everywhere, and even recent moves from companies like Apple -- and even the agreement Apple has with Wal-Mart that will let Wal-Mart shoppers buy "digital movie tickets" that can be redeemed for online movie purchases and downloads -- <a href="http://money.cnn.com/2006/10/12/magazines/business2/dvds_future.biz2/index.htm?source=aol_quote">won't cause DVD sales to just plummet</a> overnight.<br /><br />I agree with this article that states the need for a physical medium will almost always exist. The experience a DVD provides is first rate these days (except that too much non-control is given to the customer, argh), and duplicating that on a streaming platform of download does not exist. Sure, there will be large niche audiences that want to embrace non-DVD entertainment -- but for the rest of us who <a href="http://money.cnn.com/2006/10/12/magazines/business2/dvds_future.biz2/index.htm?source=aol_quote">share DVDs</a>, don't have a huge movie library on demand from our cable, Internet or satellite provider or course, the DVD and the DVD rental store still fit the bill quite nicely -- and will for quite a while.<p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;">&nbsp;</p><p><a href=http://money.cnn.com/2006/10/12/magazines/business2/dvds_future.biz2/index.htm?source=aol_quote>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/13/are-apple-wal-mart-and-others-killing-the-dvd/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/684375/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.technorati.com/cosmos/search.html?rank=&amp;fc=1&amp;url=http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/13/are-apple-wal-mart-and-others-killing-the-dvd/" title="Linking Blogs">Linking&nbsp;Blogs</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/13/are-apple-wal-mart-and-others-killing-the-dvd/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>Apple iTunes</category><category>AppleItunes</category><category>DVD</category><category>DVD downloads</category><category>DVD Rentals</category><category>DvdDownloads</category><category>DvdRentals</category><category>Ipod</category><category>iTunes</category><category>Movie downloads</category><category>MovieDownloads</category><dc:creator>Brian White</dc:creator><dc:date>2006-10-13T12:58:00+00:00</dc:date></item><item><title>Netflix will pay a cool mil for your improvements: wise crowd or foolish waste?</title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/02/netflix-will-pay-a-cool-mil-for-your-improvements-wise-crowd-or/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/02/netflix-will-pay-a-cool-mil-for-your-improvements-wise-crowd-or/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/02/netflix-will-pay-a-cool-mil-for-your-improvements-wise-crowd-or/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/amzn/" rel="tag">Amazon.com (AMZN)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/look/" rel="tag">LookSmart Ltd (LOOK)</a></p><img width="250" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="194" border="0" align="right" id="vimage_1" alt="Netflix envelope" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/10/04-09-08_netflix.jpg" />Hoping to make its <strong>recommendation feature</strong> better, the DVD mail-renter Netflix, Inc. (NASDAQ: <a href="http://aolsvc.pf.aol.com/quotes/netflix-inc/nflx/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">NFLX</a>) is <a href="http://www.netflix.com/MediaCenter?id=5368">offering </a>$1 million to the first person or group able to "reach a certain <a href="http://www.betanews.com/article/Netflix_Wants_to_Improve_Recommendations/1159798180">level of accuracy</a> in recommending movie picks" based on customer personal preferences. Something I would <strong>absolutely not</strong> call a foolish waste.<br /><br />The company has released 100 million anonymous movie ratings to use as data points. The prize will go to whoever manages to develop an algorithm that can outperform currently-used <a href="http://www.netflix.com/MediaCenter?id=1019">Cinematch</a> with at least 10% improved accuracy. Algorithms, also used by online retailers such as Amazon.com, Inc. (NASDAQ: <a href="http://aolsvc.pf.aol.com/quotes/amazon-com-inc/amzn/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">AMZN</a>) advanced rapidly for a time but have more or less plateaued.<p>Perhaps because of recent (or should I say, perennial?) <a href="http://com/news/articles/_a/aol-draws-fire-after-releasing-search/n20060807141409990018">data-release</a> and <a href="http://twx.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/04/privacy-watchdog-bites-amazon-and-ebay-in-the-uk/">net privacy</a> dust-ups, Netflix made of point of stating that the 100 million movie ratings made available for prize-seekers have been stripped of all personal and account data. Hm, I wonder if that's the last we will hear about that? <br /><br />However, I'm less interested in that than curious and anxious to see what kind of results they will get with this "wisdom of crowds" approach to R&amp;D. Forming a "wise crowd", as defined by author James Surowieki requires <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Wisdom_of_Crowds#Four_elements_required_to_form_a_wise_crowd">four elements</a>: <strong>diversity of opinion, independence, decentralization, and aggregation</strong>. This contest, assuming $1 million is a price sufficient to attract the interest of enough mathematicians, engineers, and programmers to generate a vast pool of ideas, has all four ingredients. <br /><br />(via <a href="http://www.betanews.com/article/Netflix_Wants_to_Improve_Recommendations/1159798180">BetaNews</a>)</p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;">&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/02/netflix-will-pay-a-cool-mil-for-your-improvements-wise-crowd-or/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/678458/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.technorati.com/cosmos/search.html?rank=&amp;fc=1&amp;url=http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/02/netflix-will-pay-a-cool-mil-for-your-improvements-wise-crowd-or/" title="Linking Blogs">Linking&nbsp;Blogs</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/02/netflix-will-pay-a-cool-mil-for-your-improvements-wise-crowd-or/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>amazon</category><category>amzn</category><category>dvd</category><category>million dollar prize</category><category>MillionDollarPrize</category><category>movies</category><category>netflix</category><category>nflx</category><category>recommendations</category><dc:creator>Michael Canfield</dc:creator><dc:date>2006-10-02T18:40:00+00:00</dc:date></item><item><title>Google after the bell for 9-11-06: The advertising monolith cometh</title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/11/google-after-the-bell-for-9-11-06-the-advertising-monolith-come/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/11/google-after-the-bell-for-9-11-06-the-advertising-monolith-come/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/11/google-after-the-bell-for-9-11-06-the-advertising-monolith-come/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/after-the-bell/" rel="tag">After the bell</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/blogs/" rel="tag">Blogs</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/look/" rel="tag">LookSmart Ltd (LOOK)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/09/goog091106.gif" alt="" id="vimage_1" />Google shares closed up to $384.09, an increase of $6.24 or 1.65% from Friday's close. While Google is under-the-covers planning, most likely, <a href="http://goog.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/11/indications-that-google-is-moving-into-tv-advertising/">to take on the television advertising market</a>, could the search and advertising network leader lose potential revenue to YouTube? Hardly, say media and industry pundits; and I agree with them. YouTube's content, for the most part, is unofficial video clips of people doing just about anything -- a segment that advertisers are reluctant to approach, <a href="http://www.thestreet.com/_aol/newsanalysis/technet/10308198.html">reports Jonathan Berr with TheStreet.com</a>.<br /><br />But, what if advertisers warm up to the idea of getting in front of targeted eyeballs? That seems to be the dream of every marketed, and with the world of personal and immediate communication changing due to the Internet, there's no reason that established companies and players would not want to be in front of millions -- tens of millions -- of eyeballs. It's the reason News Corp. bought MySpace.com and it's the same reason that could lead to advertisers seeking out spots on <a href="http://www.youtube.com">YouTube.com</a>. <br /><br />Fox, LookSmart and Tribune Media are even <a href="http://today.reuters.com/news/articlehybrid.aspx?type=comktNews&amp;rpc=33&amp;storyid=2006-09-11T194538Z_01_N11201383_RTRIDST_0_MEDIA-RIGHTMEDIA.XML">auctioning off ad space on non-utilized website pages</a> to drive a little (or a lot) more ad revenue for their respective networks. Looks like Internet advertising never really went away -- it just became smarter and more relevant. This is a notion that Google has apparently known since the beginning, and it's cashed in big on that bet, which ultimately came true better than the company could have hoped. Will others cash in?<br /><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;">&nbsp;</p><p><a href=http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/11/google-after-the-bell-for-9-11-06-the-advertising-monolith-come/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/666922/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.technorati.com/cosmos/search.html?rank=&amp;fc=1&amp;url=http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/11/google-after-the-bell-for-9-11-06-the-advertising-monolith-come/" title="Linking Blogs">Linking&nbsp;Blogs</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/11/google-after-the-bell-for-9-11-06-the-advertising-monolith-come/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>GOOG</category><category>Google</category><category>Google, Inc.</category><category>Google,Inc.</category><dc:creator>Brian White</dc:creator><dc:date>2006-09-11T17:02:00+00:00</dc:date></item><item><title>Prelim thoughts on Amazon moving into movie download fray: do it cheaper</title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/07/prelim-thoughts-on-amazon-moving-into-movie-download-fray-do-it/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/07/prelim-thoughts-on-amazon-moving-into-movie-download-fray-do-it/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/07/prelim-thoughts-on-amazon-moving-into-movie-download-fray-do-it/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/television/" rel="tag">Television</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/magazines/" rel="tag">Magazines</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/amzn/" rel="tag">Amazon.com (AMZN)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/look/" rel="tag">LookSmart Ltd (LOOK)</a></p><img id="vimage_1" height="138" alt="Cheap 3D Glasses" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/09/477903_3d_glasses.jpg" width="250" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" />Apple's iTunes will probably <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/05/apple-to-possibly-announce-movie-store/">start offering movies</a> soon, and Amazon too, has <a href="http://msnbc.msn.com/id/14721729/">entered the movie download biz</a> according to press reports today. Amazon (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/amazon-com-inc/amzn/nas">AMZN</a>) will also offer television shows, priced at exactly what iTunes charges: $1.99 an episode. Movies will cost around $8 to $15 at Amazon, and movies can also be rented for around $4. No idea how extensive their offerings will be, but if $15 is the high end for new releases that seems fairly in line with what Apple's expected to do. Consumers will have to figure out their own storage means for digital movies they decide to buy. Will you be burning each of these to a DVD, effectively transferring the manufacturing process to your home? Or will you store everything on drives? The main advantage to me seems to be the ability to get the stuff immediately, and without shipping charges. <br /><br />Just today happened to read a <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/07/business/media/07adco.html?ex=1157774400&amp;en=eddc3bd58e4a67d3&amp;ei=5087%0A"><em>New York Times</em> article</a> about online-only magazine subscriptions, and was struck by the fact to many online-only subscriptions cost exactly as much as buying the print version. The publisher gets to pocket the money saved in printing costs, and this is probably partly why, for example, Popular Mechanics has 1.2 million print subscribers and only 5000 email digital subscribers. Call it: "we cut costs and <em>don't</em> pass the savings on to you" merchandising. Asking us to give up the sense of ownership that a hard copy provides ought to be worth a deeper discount off convention media on this stuff. Make it cheaper and we will buy more of it.<p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;">&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/07/prelim-thoughts-on-amazon-moving-into-movie-download-fray-do-it/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/665477/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.technorati.com/cosmos/search.html?rank=&amp;fc=1&amp;url=http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/07/prelim-thoughts-on-amazon-moving-into-movie-download-fray-do-it/" title="Linking Blogs">Linking&nbsp;Blogs</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/07/prelim-thoughts-on-amazon-moving-into-movie-download-fray-do-it/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>amazon</category><category>amzn</category><category>appl</category><category>apple</category><category>digital media</category><category>DigitalMedia</category><category>downloads</category><category>itunes</category><category>movies</category><dc:creator>Michael Canfield</dc:creator><dc:date>2006-09-07T20:11:00+00:00</dc:date></item><item><title>GOOGLE, APPLE use U.S. Marine's Constant Mission Improvement!</title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/06/google-apple-use-u-s-marines-constant-mission-improvement/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/06/google-apple-use-u-s-marines-constant-mission-improvement/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/06/google-apple-use-u-s-marines-constant-mission-improvement/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/blogs/" rel="tag">Blogs</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ebay/" rel="tag">eBay (EBAY)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sbux/" rel="tag">Starbucks (SBUX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/intc/" rel="tag">Intel (INTC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/hd/" rel="tag">Home Depot (HD)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/look/" rel="tag">LookSmart Ltd (LOOK)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/tm/" rel="tag">Toyota Motor Corp. (TM)</a></p><p><img style="WIDTH: 124px; HEIGHT: 131px" height="131" alt="" src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/21/USMC_logo.svg/433px-USMC_logo.svg.png" width="124" align="right" border="0" />Most of what I write about draws on my experience as an investor over the last four decades, and my investment company interests. However, my role as an architect has taught me many valuable lessons as well. <em>One of my most cherished lessons comes from the United States Marines Corps</em>. </p>
<p><strong>Constant Mission Improvement<br /></strong>The concept of <em>Constant Mission Improvement</em> was presented to me in early programming and design meetings for an aircraft maintenance training facility at the U. S. Marine Corps Air Station, Camp Pendleton, CA. There is nothing complex about the concept. Simply stated, <strong>everything shall be reviewed on a constant basis for potential improvement, and if something can be improved then strive to make it happen.</strong> This means that each team member, owners representatives designers, engineers, managers and the rest shall be on the look out for ways to make the project better all the time.</p>
<p>Think of Jack Welch's adoption of the <strong>Six Sigma </strong>program; disciplined, <a href="http://www.isixsigma.com/st/data/"><font color="#001894">data-driven approach</font></a> and methodology for eliminating defects (driving towards six standard deviations between the mean and the nearest specification limit) in any process. </p>
<p>Think of what eBay (EBAY) should be doing and is not. </p>Once upon a time they seemed to be using a form of Constant Mission Improvement, taking feedback from buyers and sellers on a constant basis to modify the company's systems. eBay strove to be better with each passing day. It seems to have lost its way based on the seller feedback I have been receiving.
<p>The Internet creates the opportunity to make this process much more robust than ever before. This in essence is <strong>how <a href="http://www.linux.org/">Linux</a> was envisioned</strong>, and for the most part how it evolved. It demands the ultimate in cooperation.</p>
<p><strong>One for all, and all for one! </strong>Think of the Marines as the "Three Musketeers" times 10,000. The Marines are the ultimate team players. I think we were practicing Constant Mission Improvement already when we came upon the term but it added clear definition to our thinking. <strong><em>Clarity of mission</em></strong> is a related aspect of the process. How are you supposed to solve a problem or accomplish a goal if it is not clearly defined? So defining the mission is the first critical step.</p>
<p>Among our BloggingStocks companies, I think Time Warner (TWX) with its multitude of enterprises has the greatest problem with clarity of mission. Carl Icahn seems to want to help management with this. From an investor's point of view, don't you feel like they have been trying to figure things out for the past eight to ten years, even pre-merger with AOL? It probably was one of the factors that lead to the fiasco of a merger in the first place. Mr. Icahn sees the company as worth more in pieces because he rightly knows that focus and clarity will add value. It will allow investors to have a better understanding of the mission and its potential.</p>
<p>If Microsoft (MSFT) does not watch out it could, too, end up in a very muddled place. I think it has been heading in this direction as management searches for the next big thing and tries to sustain its market position in the mean time.</p>
<p><strong>Can-Do Attitude: </strong>It seems to me that Google has implemented some form of Constant Mission Improvement. Google (GOOG) and Apple (AAPL) apear to be the most focused of our BloggingStocks companies at this time, and they have seen the greatest reward in recent history-- <em>Go Eric, Go Steve!</em> Federal Express (FDX), Southwest Airlines (LUV), Starbucks (SBUX), and Toyota (TM / ADR) come to mind as well. There are many, and success can be fleeting, so the word <em>constant</em> is not to be understated. Dell is similary focused; but it may have been focused on the wrong thing for a while.</p>
<p>GM, Ford, Home Depot, and eBay are companies that seem to lose their way at times. Home Depot may be on the road back sooner than the others. They are in the process of redirecting their efforts. Just give me a call, folks I think I can help you with this! Or maybe it's <strong><em>"time to call in the Marines"</em></strong> (used to be the Cavalry)...or the children's version-- I think I can, I think I can, I think I can...choo choo!</p>
<p><strong>Joy at BloggingStocks.com: </strong>Our editors Amey Stone and Sarah Gilbert have been terrific at facilitating our story ideas. We work as a team to present ideas, and the challenge of being relevant and interesting while always polishing has been rewarding so far. I give credit also to those with some wisdom to add in their comments from time to time. They keep us sharp and more focused and also spark additional ideas to ponder for future posts...so keep it coming. I'm not always great at accepting criticism but I do enjoy making things better.</p>
<p><strong><em>Everyone should practice <a href="http://www.usmc.mil/marinelink/mcn2000.nsf/homepage?readform">Constant Mission Improvement</a> </em></strong>I have worked with every branch of the Departmentof Defense but the Marines were the best. From my experience they are as special as they present themselves; The Few, the Proud, the Brave.</p>
<p><span class="meta">Disclosure: I currently own shares of Time Warner (TWX), Federal Express (FDX) and Starbucks. I hold no position long or short in any of the other companies mentioned. Luckily we all own shares in the Marines.</span></p>
<p><span class="meta"><strong>Other recent articles:</strong></span></p>
<p><span class="meta"><a title="View Housing TROUBLE may double! (but I have hard time with the bubble) on Blogging Stocks" href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/05/housing-trouble-may-double-but-i-have-hard-time-with-the-bubbl/" target="_blank"><font color="#0b497a">Housing TROUBLE may double! (but I have hard time with the bubble)</font></a></span></p>
<p><span class="meta"><a title="View Microsoft Zune - What is in a name? on Blogging Stocks" href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/01/microsoft-zune-what-is-in-a-name/" target="_blank"><font color="#0b497a">Microsoft Zune - What is in a name?</font></a></span></p>
<p><span class="meta"><a title="View The BORING FACTOR: new predictor? on Blogging Stocks" href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/28/the-boring-factor-new-predictor/" target="_blank"><font color="#0b497a">The BORING FACTOR: new predictor?</font></a></span></p>
<p><span class="meta"></span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/24/about-the-stock-bloggers-sheldon-d-liber-aia/"><em>Sheldon Liber</em></a><em> is the CEO of a small private investment company and the vice president for Design and Research of an Architecture &amp; Planning firm.</em></p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;">&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/06/google-apple-use-u-s-marines-constant-mission-improvement/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/662367/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.technorati.com/cosmos/search.html?rank=&amp;fc=1&amp;url=http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/06/google-apple-use-u-s-marines-constant-mission-improvement/" title="Linking Blogs">Linking&nbsp;Blogs</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/06/google-apple-use-u-s-marines-constant-mission-improvement/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>Amey Stone</category><category>AmeyStone</category><category>Can Do Attitude</category><category>CanDoAttitude</category><category>Constant Mission Improvement</category><category>ConstantMissionImprovement</category><category>LINUX</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>MSFT</category><category>Sarah Gilbert</category><category>SarahGilbert</category><category>Sheldon Liber</category><category>SheldonLiber</category><category>Six Sigma</category><category>SixSigma</category><category>Team Players</category><category>TeamPlayers</category><category>Three Musketeers</category><category>ThreeMusketeers</category><category>Time Warner</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>TWX</category><category>United State Marines</category><category>UnitedStateMarines</category><category>USMC</category><dc:creator>Sheldon Liber</dc:creator><dc:date>2006-09-06T17:31:00+00:00</dc:date></item><item><title>More competition for Google -- a MySpace Search Engine?</title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/12/more-competition-for-google-a-myspace-search-engine/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/12/more-competition-for-google-a-myspace-search-engine/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/12/more-competition-for-google-a-myspace-search-engine/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/look/" rel="tag">LookSmart Ltd (LOOK)</a></p><p>Bambi Francisco, a columnist at MarketWatch, has a very interesting piece this week: <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/News/Story/Story.aspx?dist=newsfinder&amp;siteid=google&amp;guid=%7B8204D015-0D7A-45A9-B39D-16C3F6D773C8%7D&amp;keyword=">MySpace-engine</a>.  </p>
<p>Despite being the second most trafficked site on the Web, MySpace is still a teenager when it comes to monetization. True, generating $200 million in revenues is no small feat (especially for a company less than three years old). Then again, companies like Google and Yahoo! are sucking-up much of the enormous amounts spent for online advertising.</p>
<p>So, why shouldn't MySpace jump into the search game? One idea would be to purchase a company like LookSmart (Nasdaq: LOOK). The company has made a comeback - and more importantly, has the necessary search infrastructure (which took hundreds of millions to develop over the years). And the market cap is dirt cheap: $95 million. In fact, the company has $44 million in cash and liquid securities.</p>
<p>According to Francisco, about 8.2% of Google's traffic comes from tools on MySpace.com. Interestingly enough, it is the biggest source of traffic for Google. So, it looks like a no brainer for MySpace to have its own search engine.</p>
<p>Actually, this morning,  I talked with the CEO of a company called <a href="http://www.foldera.com">Foldera</a>. It's a Web 2.0 collaborative tool focused on small to medium-sized businesses. His product also pushes lots of traffic to Google. "Why not try to monetize this large amount of corporate traffic?" he told me.</p>
<p>Yes, many online communities are asking themselves this question. And, with the huge amounts of money at stake in the online advertising market, Google will need to deal with fierce competition on all fronts - not just from Yahoo and MSN.</p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;">&nbsp;</p><p><a href=http://www.marketwatch.com/News/Story/Story.aspx?dist=newsfinder&amp;siteid=google&amp;guid=%7B8204D015-0D7A-45A9-B39D-16C3F6D773C8%7D&amp;keyword=>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/12/more-competition-for-google-a-myspace-search-engine/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/617726/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.technorati.com/cosmos/search.html?rank=&amp;fc=1&amp;url=http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/12/more-competition-for-google-a-myspace-search-engine/" title="Linking Blogs">Linking&nbsp;Blogs</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/12/more-competition-for-google-a-myspace-search-engine/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>Foldera</category><category>LookSmart</category><category>MySpace.com</category><dc:creator>Tom Taulli</dc:creator><dc:date>2006-05-12T00:17:00+00:00</dc:date></item></channel></rss>